STUDYING THE PROCEDURE COMPONENT OF LEARNING MOTIVES OF STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT GPA

(ON THE EXAMPLE OF STUDENTS OF KHACHATUR ABOVIAN. ASPU)

Authors

  • Mari KELOYAN Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/miopap.v17i1.368

Keywords:

procedural component, learning motivation, learning actions, reading comprehension, focus group

Abstract

The article focuses on the study of the procedural component of students' learning motives from the faculties of humanities of ASPU. As an academic task has been taken reading comprehension, and reading comprehension actions have been considered as procedural components of learning motives.

The focus group method was chosen as an effective method for studying the above-mentioned issue. The results of the focus group study, that's the variety of reading comprehension actions of students with different GPA (Grade Point Average) were revealed and grouped. The actions or strategies of medium and especially low GPA students are poor for ensuring deep comprehension of academic texts, which in its turn decreases learning motivation, while students with high-GPA mainly perform mental actions of different complexity levels for ensuring text comprehension which in turn increases intrinsic learning motivation.

Author Biography

Mari KELOYAN, Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University

PhD. Assistant in Chair of Psychology. Khachatur Abovyan Armenian State Pedagogical University

References

Belanovskij S. A. (2001). Metod fokus-grup. (Focus group method). (s. 280). Moskva: Nikollo-M.

Bodrov V.A., Lozhkin G.V., Pljushh A.N. (2001). Nelinejnaja model' motivacionnoj sfery lichnosti. (Nonlinear model of the motivational sphere of personality) Psihol. Zhurn. № 1. S. 90-100.

Karapetjan V.S., Kelojan M.A. (2014). Sootnoshenie uchebnoj motivacii i obrazovatel'nyh cennostej v estestvennonauchnyh potokah vysshego pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija. (The ratio of educational motivation and educational values in the natural science flows of higher pedagogical education.) Universum: Psihologija i obrazovanie: jelektron. nauchn. zhurn. № 5-6(6), str. 9 /RINC/ URL:http://7universum.com/ru/psy/archive/item/1378

Kelojan M. A. (2014). Sootnoshenie uchebnoj motivacii i akademicheskoj uspevaemosti studentov ASPU. ASPU im Kh. Abovyana, Erevan, Uchenye zapiski (The ratio of educational motivation and academic performance of students of ASPU. ASPU after H. Abovyan, Yerevan, Scientific Notes) № 2-3 (21-22), 23-28

Mel'nikova O.T. (2007). Fokus-gruppy: metody, metodologija, modelirovanie. (Focus groups: methods, methodology, modeling) (s. 321). Moskva: Aspekt-press,

Mel'nikova O.T., Horoshilov D.A., (2010). Urovni analiza dannyh kachestvennogo isle-dovanija. Voprosy psihologii. (Levels of data analysis of qualitative research. Psychology Issues). N 3, 12-19 Pino-Juste, Margarita & López, Beatriz. Learning Strategies in Higher Education. International Journal of Learning. 17. 259-274. Doi 10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v17i01/46813. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288596597_Learning_Strategies_in_Higher_Education

Schellings, Gonny. (2011). Applying learning strategy questionnaires: Problems and possibilities. Metacognition and Learning. 6. 91-109. 10.1007/s11409-011-9069-5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226427486_Applying_learning_strategy_questionnaires_Problems_and_possibilities

Veenman, M.V.J., Prins, F.J., & Verheij, J. (2003) Learning styles: Self-reports versus thinking-aloud measures. British Journal of Educational Psychology, pp. 357–372. https://www.academia.edu/16575470/Learning_styles_Self-reports_versus_thinking-aloud_measures

Downloads

Published

2020-04-28

How to Cite

KELOYAN, M. (2020). STUDYING THE PROCEDURE COMPONENT OF LEARNING MOTIVES OF STUDENTS WITH DIFFERENT GPA: (ON THE EXAMPLE OF STUDENTS OF KHACHATUR ABOVIAN. ASPU). Main Issues Of Pedagogy And Psychology, 17(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.24234/miopap.v17i1.368

Issue

Section

Articles