Pedagogical Compatibility as a Contemporary Problem
Keywords:pedagogical compatibility, principles, methods, competencies of pedagogical compatibility implementation
One of the main problems of contemporary pedagogy is the necessity to consider pedagogical compatibility from an ideological point of view.
It dictates to study the problem of interaction between the teacher and the learner, affect one another's physical and psychological health, and maintaining one another's health in the pedagogical process. The article is based on the results of our questionnaire surveys, conversations among teachers, students, and their parents.
The surveys revealed that in some schools still persists the teacher’s authoritarianism and intolerance towards pupils. While organizing the pedagogical process, only a small part of teachers emphasized the health requirements of the lesson, most of them did not pay attention to the problem of pedagogical compatibility, in particular, the process of interaction between the student and teacher was not considered from the point of view of the health of both. However, the majority of teachers realize that the quality of their pupils' education, the effectiveness of their work, the motivation of children towards education, ensuring their creativity and safety at school largely depend on it.
Thus, the question was raised that in the processes of professional education and advanced training of teachers to seriously discuss this problem and provide relevant pieces of knowledge and competencies to the beneficiaries. All of this has prompted the need to enrich the theory of the term “Pedagogical compatibility” and develop a methodological system for its practical implementation. The article defines the essence of the new term “Pedagogical compatibility for health protection”. The principles, methods, the pedagogical conditions necessary for its implementation, the model of competencies the teacher needs in this field are presented.
Topuzyan A. & others (2017). ''Pedagogical Health Science in Elementary Education”. Methodological manual, NAS RA, 171 pages
Minassian, B. (1931). Fundamentals of Pedagogy. Tabriz. 450 pages.
Gevorgyan S., Hovhannisyan A. & others (2014). Psycho-pedagogical Dictionary. author Publisher, Yerevan. 261 pages.
Obozov, N. (2001). Tipi lichnosti, temperament i kharakter. Sankt-Peterburg. 40 st.
?llakhverdieva, ?. (2017). Peregavori v socialnoy rabote. Uchebnoe posobie. SPB-SPBGU. 134 str.
Kondratieva O. (1996). Psikhologicheskie tipi, lichnost uchiteley kak uslovie formirovaniya profesionalnovo stilya dejatelnosti. Diss.kand. psikh. nauk, N.Novgorod.
Shutts V. (2008). Glubokoe prostata. Osnovi jiznennoy filosofii Azbuka-klassika. M. 244 st.
Izard K. (2006). Emocii cheloveka, Moskva 311 st.
Gazman O. (1990). Gumanizm i svoboda: gumanizaciya vospitaniya v sovremennikh usloviyakh, Moskva, 137 st.
Mikhaylova N. i drugie, (2006). Pedagogicheskaya podderjka rebyonka v obrazovanii, Moskva, 207 st.
Bazarni V. (1995) Ekspress-diaknostiki dinamiki psikhosensornovo funkcionalnovo I fizicheskovo razvitiya uchashchikhsya, Sergiev Posad, 151 st.
Dikhan L. (2002). Usloviya valeologizacii obrazovatelnoy sredi shkolnikov. Valeologiya N 2, M.
Kodjaspirova G. (2005). Pedagogicheskaya antropologiya. Gardariki, Moskva, 284 st.
Kondratiev S. (2003). Psikhologicheskie tipi uchiteley i studentov. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, N 3 (s. 52-57), Moskva.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Main Issues Of Pedagogy And Psychology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.