TEACHERS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS ICT INTEGRATION: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT THROUGH BLENDED LEARNING
Keywords:Blended learning, e-course design, ICT integration in teaching, in service teachers, teachers’ perception
The rapid growth in Information Communication and Technologies (ICT) has brought remarkable changes in the recent years. ICT is becoming increasingly important in daily lives and in educational system. As the teacher plays a very essential role in the management of learning, they should possess training in using the most modern technologies in the field of education. So the teachers’ perception is important as it forms a tendency which helps them to be favourable or unfavourable towards the usage of the most modern technology in the field of education in future when they go out for teaching.
2. Parasuraman, A. “Technology readiness index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies,” Journal of Service Research, 2, 307-320, 2000.
3. Teacher Technology Competency Committee (TTCC), Teacher Technology Competencies, 1998. [online] available: accessed 10 march 2016.
4. http://www.edb.utexas.edu/education/assets/files/ltc/about/TTCompetencies.pdf .
5. M. K. Afifi & S .S Alamri, “Effective principles in designing E-course in light of learning theories,” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 128-142, 2014.
6. P. Marc. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6, 2001.
7. Buchholz, A & A. Zerfass, E-content in Europe: Dimensions of an emerging field: E-Content. Technologies and Perspectives for the European Market. ISBN: 978-3-540-25093-X Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2005.
8. L. Eremias & R. Subash, “E-content development: a milestone in the dynamic progress of e-learning,” International Journal of Teacher Educational Research (IJTER) Vol.2 No.1 January,2013 ISSN: 2319-4642, 2013.
9. B. Seels & R.C. Richey, Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communication and Technology,1994.
10. Charalambos, V., Michalinos, Z., & Chamberlain, R, “The design of online learning communities: Critical issues,” Educational Media International, 41(2), 135-143.
11. Ho, V., Nakamoria, Y., Ho, T., Ho, S, Study on A Model for Teacher Professional Development In Vietnam Based On Knowledge Management, Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the ISSS, HaiPhong, Vietnam, 2014.
12. Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (in press). Handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing, 2004.
13. Singh, H., & Reed, C. A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning, 2001.[online] retrieved November, 2014 from http://www.leerbeleving.nl/wbts/wbt2014/blend-ce.pdf
14. Eryilmaz, A. “The Effectiveness Of Blended Learning Environments,” Contemporary Issues In Education Research – 4th Quarter Volume 8, Number 4,2015.
15. Graham, C. R., Allen, S. and Ure, D, Blended learning environments: A review of the research literature. Unpublished manuscript, Provo, UT.Reasons, S. G. (2004).
16. C. R. Graham, Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions, In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp. 3–21. SanFrancisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing, 2006.
17. C. Weaver, What encourages student participation in online discussions?, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southern Queensland, Towomba, Australia, 2005.
18. H. L. Lim and f. Sudweeks, “Student perceptions of participation opportunities in online synchronous tutorials” in Méndez-Vilas, A., Solano Martin, A., Mesa González, J. And Mesa González, J. A. (eds), Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education, Vol. 2, Badajoz, Spain: Formatex, pp 1486-1490-2006.