ON THE ISSUE OF THE PERCEPTION OF THE OTHER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24234/miopap.v12i2.107Keywords:
perception of the other, situational scale of the other assessment, descriptive scale of the other assessment, culture, valuesAbstract
Perceptions of the other have been known since ancient times. References to these perceptions can be found in mythological tales of different peoples, historical sources, and anthropological studies. In the psychological discipline, the perception of the other is also in the spotlight, both among social and clinical psychologists. Of particular importance are the processes of interaction, communication, and socialization of individuals in society between different cultural and social groups, during which perceptions of the other become relevant. Perceptions of the other are characteristic of all societies. However, in different historical periods, perceptions and attitudes towards both one's own, native environment, and foreign, alien societies have undergone certain changes. Perceptions of the other have undergone certain transformations. The other was perceived as a non-local person, standing outside the native social and cultural environment; the other was accepted as a person who opposed the native environment and did not follow social norms; he could also be perceived as unfamiliar and inaccessible to cognition; in some cases also as someone with incomprehensible and inexplicable power. However, negative assessments prevail in the perceptions of the other: the other is mainly perceived as a person who poses a threat to the self environment and is hostile. Such perceptions of the other are often explained by the activation of the person’s defense mechanisms against any unknown and unfamiliar phenomenon. However, from the standpoint of social psychology, the discovery and analysis of modern perceptions of the other, the identification of psychological tools and mechanisms for distinguishing one’s environment from others, will make it possible to study the current manifestations and tendencies of the formation of a person’s socio-psychological identity. This article discusses theoretical approaches to the issue of the perception of the other, as well as presents a new author’s method: "The Other’s Value Assessment Scale", which aims to identify the specifics of the other’s situational and descriptive perceptions.
References
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal and curiosity. New York.
Brediau, S. (2018). The Other in Perception: A Phenomenological account of our experience of other persons. SUNY Press.
Chandran, K. Narayana. (2023). Strange, and Stranger Ways With Strangers. Studia Polensia, 12(1), 7–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.32728/studpol/2023.12.01.01.
Diken, Bülent (1998) Strangers, Ambivalence and Social Theory. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Ho, Khanh.(2011). Stranger Among Fellow Strangers. Amerasia Journal, 37(1), 76–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.17953/amer.37.1.d71748q7644j1v77.
Kearney, R., Semonovitch, K. (Eds.). (2011). Phenomenologies of the Stranger: Between Hostility and Hospitality. Fordham University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt13x0brs
Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. 388-433. In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Klüver, H. (1925). The Problem of Type in “Cultural Science Psychology.” The Journal of Philosophy, 22(9), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/2014404
Kononov, N., Ein-Gar, D. (2023). Beautiful Strangers: Physical Evaluation of Strangers Is Influenced by Friendship Expectation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(12), 1725-1736. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231180150
Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (2000). Emergent themes and potential approaches to attitude function: The function-structure model of attitudes. 417-442. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
McAdams, D. P. (1994). A Psychology of the Stranger. Psychological Inquiry, 5(2), 145–148. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1449284
Rokeach, М. (1973). The nature of human values. N.Y.: Free Press.
Sandstrom, G. M., Boothby, E. J., Cooney, G. (2022). Talking to strangers: A week-long intervention reduces psychological barriers to social connection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,102, ISSN 0022-1031, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104356. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103122000750.
Schutz, Alfred (1944). The Stranger: An Essay in Social Psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 49(6), 499–507.
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
Simoneli, A., Parolin, M. (2016). Strange Situation Test. In Encylopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer International Publishing AG. 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2043-1.
Xu, Tongwen, Yunhong Lyu. (2023). Keeping a Safe Confession Distance between Strangers: The Spatial Structure of Social Accessibility in Networked Communities and Risk Avoidance of Stranger Confessions. Studies in Media and Communication, 11(6), 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/smc.v11i6.6046.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tatevik Vatyan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
