DIAGNOSING THE LEVEL OF UPBRINGING OF PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN AS AN EFFECTIVE PREREQUISITE FOR THE UPBRINGING PROCESS

Authors

  • Betty KILLERJIAN Armenian
  • Gayane YEGANYAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24234/miopap.v1i11.22

Keywords:

Upbringing, Diagnostics, Diagnostics of upbringing, diagnostic methodology, primary school, child development, educational assessment, behavioral evaluation, educational foundations

Abstract

At the stage of rapid development of science and technology, the primary task of the school is the formation of a comprehensively developed personality, which is carried out in the pedagogical process, the structure of which includes an important and mandatory process of education. It is impossible to organize a well-founded process of personality development without pedagogical diagnostics aimed at studying the individual characteristics of pupils and the socio-psychological characteristics of the children's collective.

      With the help of diagnostic techniques, the teacher receives data on the state of the educational process, the quality of education and upbringing of students, processes this data, analyzes and evaluates them, corrects and predicts the development of the educational process and students.

       In the process, the younger generations must assimilate what has already been accumulated by society, that is, to assimilate educational knowledge, values brought to their level of development, master a certain culture of behavior, abilities, learn the norms and experience of society's behavior and develop a certain system of views on life.

     Upbringing is the process of transferring social and historical experience by the older generation to new generations in order to prepare them for life and work, which is necessary to ensure the further development of society.

     Today, modern society is moving towards the modernization of education. As a result of significant transformations, state educational and subject standards are aimed at teaching in their content, giving secondary importance to the education of students and value orientation.

    It is necessary to determine the level of upbringing with the help of diagnostic tools, methods and techniques and, based on the identified qualities, organize a student-oriented and personality-oriented upbringing process.

References

Amirdzhanian, Y. S., & Saakian, A. S. (2004). Pedagogy (in Armenian, 456 pages). Yerevan, Armenia: Pedagogika.

Babanskiy, Y. K., & Babanskiy, M. Y. (1989). Selected pedagogical works (560 pages). Moscow, Russia: Pedagogika.

Baiborodova, L. V. (2005). Research on the effectiveness of the school education system (45 pages). Moscow, Russia.

Baranov, S. P., Bolotina, L. R., & Slastenin, V. A. (1987). Pedagogy: Textbook for students of teacher training colleges (2nd ed., 368 pages). Moscow, Russia: Prosveshchenie.

Kapustin, N. P., & Shilov, M. I. (2021). Levels of upbringing according to diagnostic program methodologies. Retrieved from https://nsportal.ru/nachalnaya-shkola/psikhologiya/2021/12/16/metodika-urovni-vospitannosti-modifikatsiya-metodik-n-p

Meshkov, N. I., & Kharitonova, I. V. (2010). Pedagogy: A brief course of lectures. Textbook (149 pages). Saransk, Russia.

National Statistical Service of the Republic of Armenia. (2024). Data on Armenia's sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://sdg.armstat.am/am/

Osnitsky, A. K. (1996). Psychology of independence: Research and diagnostic methods (124 pages). Moscow-Nalchik, Russia: El-Fa.

Podymova, L. S., & Slastenin, V. A. (Eds.). (2014). Pedagogy: Textbook for bachelors (332 pages). Moscow, Russia: Soyouright Publishing.

Republic of Armenia. (2022). Law on the approval of the state program for the development of education in the Republic of Armenia until 2030. Retrieved from http://www.irtek.am/views/act.aspx?aid=156043

Downloads

Published

25-04-2024

How to Cite

KILLERJIAN, B., & YEGANYAN, G. (2024). DIAGNOSING THE LEVEL OF UPBRINGING OF PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN AS AN EFFECTIVE PREREQUISITE FOR THE UPBRINGING PROCESS. Main Issues Of Pedagogy And Psychology, 11(1), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.24234/miopap.v1i11.22